• <object id="wmooc"><u id="wmooc"></u></object>
  • 首页> 外文学位 >文献详情
    【6h】

    End user resource valuation in community college libraries: A Q methodology study.

    机译:社区大学图书馆中的最终用户资源评估:Q方法论研究。

    获取原文
    获取原文并翻译 | 示例
    ¥30

    摘要

    The purpose of this study was to explore the valuation process of community college library end-users as they decide which information resources to use when conducting research. This study was designed as an exploratory study using Q methodology and focused on five specific information resources that community college library end-users routinely use in their research process: the Internet, the reference librarian, books, newspapers, and subscription databases. Little is known about the valuation hierarchy that end-users overlay on these resources when deciding which ones to use to address a specific research need.;The results of the study suggest that community college library end-users value, to varying degrees, all five of the information resources selected for this study. The results also suggest that while the Internet has become a dominant information resource in the community college library end-user's research process, other more traditional information resources such as the reference librarian, books, and, to a lesser extent, newspapers still hold value in the research process. The perspectives described and the interpretation provided in this study can greatly assist community college library end-users in the valuation of available community college library information resources.;Sixty-four community college library end-users from four main campuses of a large community college sorted 40 statements describing specific value statements pertaining to the information resources under study. The statements were sorted along a continuum ranging from least like me (-4) to most like me (+4) with 0 representing an opinion of neutrality. Following these procedures, five factors emerged that represented different perspectives on value relating to the five information resources under study. Interpretation of these factors yielded distinct patterns of opinion relating to the perceived value of each information resource. These factors were named: (a) Browsers, (b) Proficient, (c) Vacillators, (d) Bibliophiles, and (e) Traditionalists.
    机译:这项研究的目的是探索社区大学图书馆最终用户在进行研究时决定使用哪些信息资源时的估值过程。这项研究被设计为使用Q方法的探索性研究,并着重于社区大学图书馆最终用户在研究过程中常规使用的五个特定信息资源:互联网,参考图书馆员,书籍,报纸和订阅数据库。最终用户在决定使用哪种资源来满足特定研究需求时,对这些资源所覆盖的评估等级知之甚少;研究结果表明,社区大学图书馆的最终用户在所有程度上都对这五个价值有所重视。本研究选择的信息资源。研究结果还表明,尽管互联网已成为社区大学图书馆最终用户研究过程中的主要信息资源,但其他更传统的信息资源,例如参考图书馆员,书籍,以及在较小程度上,报纸仍然具有一定的价值。研究过程。本研究中描述的观点和提供的解释可以极大地帮助社区大学图书馆最终用户评估可用的社区大学图书馆信息资源。;来自大型社区学院四个主要园区的64个社区大学图书馆最终用户被分类40条描述与研究中的信息资源有关的特定价值的陈述。这些陈述是按照连续性排序的,范围从最小的我(-4)到最喜欢的我(+4),0表示中立。按照这些程序,出现了五个因素,分别代表与所研究的五个信息资源有关的价值的不同观点。对这些因素的解释产生了与每种信息资源的感知价值有关的不同观点模式。这些因素被命名为:(a)浏览器,(b)熟练,(c)变动者,(d)藏书人,以及(e)传统主义者。

    著录项

    • 作者

      Lucy, Theodore John.;

    • 作者单位

      University of North Florida.;

    • 授予单位 University of North Florida.;
    • 学科 Education, Community College.;Education, Higher Education Administration.;Library Science.
    • 学位 Ed.D.
    • 年度 2010
    • 页码 189 p.
    • 总页数 189
    • 原文格式 PDF
    • 正文语种 eng
    • 中图分类 ;
    • 原文服务方 国家工程技术数字图书馆
    • 关键词

      ;

    相似文献

    • 外文文献
    站内服务

    联系方式:18141920177 (微信同号)

    客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

    京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司?版权所有
    • 客服微信

    • 服务号

    婷婷五月亚洲综合图区_五十路A片熟妇在线观看_国产成人免费资源在线播放_欧美成人熟妇激情视频